Missing links for.over a week now.. upset

Issuer Appeals & Curation Policy Appeals
#1
  1. Drop ID 53947
    Screenshot_20220711-120702_Proton Mail
    Screenshot_20220711-120702_Proton Mail1440×2240 189 KB
#2

:ocean: :wave:@Native2Crypto

The Curation Body needs more information to assist you.

Can you please follow this structure? :point_down:

  1. Event ID:
  2. Community information (All relevant socials Twitter, Discord, Youtube, Websites, etc.)
  3. Nature of the event
  4. Distribution Method
  5. Why do you believe this petition is being held?

All the best,
The POAP Curation Body

#4

Can you please follow this structure? :point_down:

  1. Event ID:#53947
  2. Community information (All relevant socials , Discord, Youtube, Websites, etc.)
    https://www.nft365podcast.com/
  3. Nature of the event nftnyc365
  4. Distribution Method i needd links 2 weeks ago
  5. Why do you believe this petition is being held? Not a clue and really frustrating to have to deal with this process.

All the best,
The POAP Curation Body

#5

Hey @Native2Crypto

Curators made a negative review of your petition for engagement farming concerns.

When we say that POAP is an ecosystem for the preservation of memories, we intend for POAPs to be mementos of a particular experience. A part of the core value proposition of POAPs is that they are a souvenir your get simply for doing something you generally like to do in your life – there is no particular transactional incentive.

“Engagement farming” is generally defined as issuers using POAPs in a way that incentivizes transactional behavior. Any statement to the effect of “Do X to get a POAP” – particularly where X is an action that boosts performance in social media algorithms – is basically a marker of engagement farming.

“Like to get a POAP”
“Follow to get a POAP”
“Tweet about it to get a POAP”
…

these all violate Issuer Guidelines on proper usage of POAP.

Please read the documentation and let us know if you have any questions.

All the best,
The POAP Curation Body

#6