#30583 - Appeal

  1. Drop ID

  2. Community information

  3. Nature of the event
    This was our Valentine’s event. Members were invited to discuss all things related to Valentine’s, and witness live artist previews ahead of a unique 1-of-1 artwork being painted in realtime.

  1. Distribution plan
    We have curated their wallet IDs in a locked channel.

  2. Why do you believe this petition is being held?
    I was told our request was denied for engagement farming concerns.
    The curation body cited “re-tweeting” as a requirement for POAP distribution, which was not true.
    We never requested users re-tweet, like, comment, or follow our Twitter to obtain the POAP.
    Members were only invited to join the Discord and participate in the Valentine celebration.
    Participation in the chat was required, and attendance was limited to the Feb 14th event.
    We took every measure to prune accounts with low-activity or did not pass a bot-trap.

Please review the case again.
I genuinely believe that we have followed all guidelines regarding distribution.

Thank you, kindly.

Hey @deathwishnft

I’m sorry but the Curation Body made a negative review of both of your petitions #30583 and #28985 (both with the same artwork and description)

The information was confusing for Curators since you requested 500 codes for a community that has 146 members.

For future drops:
Please make sure that the number of POAPs requested approximates attendance somewhat closely. Curators monitor the size and nature of the communities to evaluate whether requests are reasonable.

Find more information about the subject here: Curator Guidelines: Creating Quality Drops

All the best,
The POAP Curation Body